Richard Murphy notes the news that corporate tax avoidance was central to the weakness of Fannie and Freddie. ”Deferred tax” was a key part of the work Richard did for the TUC in The Missing Billions. The pamphlet critiqued deferred tax for the vast sums this technique denies to public funds. The fact that it may also have played a part in the current global crisis is obviously of enormous importance. How many UK banks are playing the same dangerous game?
One Response to Fannie, Freddie and tax avoidance
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Web links for 23rd May 2012
- The government’s unimpressive job creation record
- BoE Agents’ Report suggests unemployment due to rise
- Euro-Parliament’s clear message to EU leaders: for growth’s sake, let’s have a Robin Hood Tax!
- Pat McFadden is right: we need to be making things
- Pressure mounts on single parents to move off unemployment benefits, but where are the family-friendly jobs?
- Monetary and fiscal stimulus are not the same thing
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
- Cost of Living: Time to write a letter to the poorest?
- Economic inequality and social justice – lessons from Northern Europe
- G8: Facing both ways means facing the wrong way
- It’s just business. Is that the extent of our foreign policy?
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Are banks relying on deferred tax as part of their capital here? | called2account on Sep 11th 2008 at 12:00 pm:
[...] Adam Lent of the TUC has asked an obvious question following on from my blog about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac relying on deferred taxation as part of their capital structure. As he puts it: [...]