Richard Murphy notes the news that corporate tax avoidance was central to the weakness of Fannie and Freddie. ”Deferred tax” was a key part of the work Richard did for the TUC in The Missing Billions. The pamphlet critiqued deferred tax for the vast sums this technique denies to public funds. The fact that it may also have played a part in the current global crisis is obviously of enormous importance. How many UK banks are playing the same dangerous game?
One Response to Fannie, Freddie and tax avoidance
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Some good news on jobs, but what does it mean?
- Freeze the auto-enrolment thresholds to keep women in pensions
- The magnificent (European) nine backing Robin Hood
- Web links for 7th February 2012
- Communities must share in the growing benefits of onshore wind
- Cameron plans to let Europe take £21bn a year from the City … and we get nothing!
- EU Robin Hood Tax would boost growth, say experts
- Now Tory MPs attack wind industry jobs
- So there is no shortage of jobs?
- UN Secretary General condemns austerity, calls for action against inequality
- Giving future Olympic Games an ethical dimension
- Web links for 3rd February 2012
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Are banks relying on deferred tax as part of their capital here? | called2account on Sep 11th 2008 at 12:00 pm:
[...] Adam Lent of the TUC has asked an obvious question following on from my blog about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac relying on deferred taxation as part of their capital structure. As he puts it: [...]