<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protectionism: Peston provokes but gets it right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:14:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Marks</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2090#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>For sure, if a rescuing jobs means Chinese ownership - fine. But cooperative ownership? Finer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure, if a rescuing jobs means Chinese ownership &#8211; fine. But cooperative ownership? Finer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big economy protectionism is the &#8220;lump of labour&#8221; fallacy gone global &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Big economy protectionism is the &#8220;lump of labour&#8221; fallacy gone global &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2090#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>[...] of labour&#8221; fallacy gone global  Posted at 6:37 pm on 12 Mar 09 by Nigel   Adam&#8217;s opposition to big economy protectionism has proved controversial in some quarters. Yet it seems to me that protectionism is the mirrow image [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of labour&#8221; fallacy gone global  Posted at 6:37 pm on 12 Mar 09 by Nigel   Adam&#8217;s opposition to big economy protectionism has proved controversial in some quarters. Yet it seems to me that protectionism is the mirrow image [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2090#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>But Owen hits the nail on the head.  When thousands of jobs and livelihoods are at risk, this great movement of ours can be very pragmatic.  And rightly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Owen hits the nail on the head.  When thousands of jobs and livelihoods are at risk, this great movement of ours can be very pragmatic.  And rightly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Marks</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2090#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>But hang on a minute: are we really saying that the aim of this great movement of ours is to have foreign rather than domestic capitalists owning large swathes of the economy? Trade, like markets, should be regulated. To parrot the capitalists defence of free trade is to do a disservice to the union movement - they have plenty of money to hire propagandists of their own, let them harp on about free trade and free markets.

We should be looking to popularize cooperative forms of ownership by workers and consumers. The building societies haven&#039;t had to be bailed out by the government - the ex-building societies have; workers cooperatives don&#039;t union-bust or get involved in blacklisting workers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But hang on a minute: are we really saying that the aim of this great movement of ours is to have foreign rather than domestic capitalists owning large swathes of the economy? Trade, like markets, should be regulated. To parrot the capitalists defence of free trade is to do a disservice to the union movement &#8211; they have plenty of money to hire propagandists of their own, let them harp on about free trade and free markets.</p>
<p>We should be looking to popularize cooperative forms of ownership by workers and consumers. The building societies haven&#8217;t had to be bailed out by the government &#8211; the ex-building societies have; workers cooperatives don&#8217;t union-bust or get involved in blacklisting workers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Tudor</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/03/protectionism-peston-provokes-but-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Tudor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2090#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>Regarding Robert Peston&#039;s argument that the Chinese should buy up western assets: when Rover was faced with complete closure a few years ago, the then TGWU mounted a campaign precisely to persuade a Chinese motor company to buy the marque to save jobs (in the end, a different Chinese car company bought Rover, with far fewer jobs saved). So this is not completely groundbreaking new thinking....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Robert Peston&#8217;s argument that the Chinese should buy up western assets: when Rover was faced with complete closure a few years ago, the then TGWU mounted a campaign precisely to persuade a Chinese motor company to buy the marque to save jobs (in the end, a different Chinese car company bought Rover, with far fewer jobs saved). So this is not completely groundbreaking new thinking&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-05-24 10:42:10 -->
