From the TUC

What does the MP expenses scandal mean for politics?

15 May 2009, by in Economics, Politics

The short answer is that no-one can know how the deep public anger against MPs will play out. When the Telegraph led for two days on Labour MPs it looked very bad for the government. But now each party’s skeletons have come out of the expenses records filing cabinets the public mood seems much more to be a plague on all your houses.

As Brendan says there are grave dangers that the BNP will benefit, though other minor parties will do well too in the Euro-elections. After all these are PR elections for a body that most voters fail to take very seriously, so voting patterns are always more diverse than in a Westminster election. Indeed the polls already show a boost for UKIP. This is deeply ironic, considering that they are the only party to have had a prominent elected representative convicted of fraud in recent years. 

The deep cynicism about all politicians however must be bad for a government that is so behind in the polls. If no-one is listening, it makes any kind of relaunch or fresh appeal that much harder. This is clearly good news for the right even if they have lost respect and support too.

But there is also an ideological boost for them.  David Cameron’s early attempts to rebrand the Conservatives as pro-public services have been rather superseded by the new emphasis on reducing the public sector deficit on a rapid timescale. A scepticism that the state can do good has always been a key ingredient in the Conservative coalition. It has not always gone down well with the normal British response that “something ought to be done about it” when any policy issue is raised. The expenses scandal however has caused many to think that MPs are only in it for themselves and that you cannot look to democratic institutions to help create the good society.

Yet  part of the outrage is also motivated by an undoubtedly progressive belief that MPs are doing too well out of  growing inequality. Anger at Sir Fred Goodwin has moved on to anger at MPs – even if the worst parliamentary offenders have gained a tiny fraction of Goodwin’s loot. MPs promising to write cheques for thousands of pounds to pay back their expenses may well be the right thing to do, but the vast majority of the population could not write a cheque for a thousand pounds just like that. The fact that MPs all seem to have such disposable wealth simply reinforces their bad image.

So that’s one ideological gain for the right and one for the left. No wonder it’s all so confusing.

6 Responses to What does the MP expenses scandal mean for politics?

  1. Making money
    May 16th 2009, 7:06 pm

    I think the MP have been taking advatage for years, it seems their attitude is that it is a perk of the job. But I beleive it has blown out of control with the media. Come on, get some sense and move on to some real news stories.

  2. Expenses and inequality | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC
    May 18th 2009, 1:28 pm

    […] and inequality Posted at 1:28 pm on 18 May 09 by Nicola Smith Nigel has pointed out that part of the expenses outrage is “motivated by a progressive belief that MPs are doing […]

  3. Robert
    May 21st 2009, 10:19 am

    So move on to something else why, if you have MP’s who commit fraud then only one answer, no different then a disabled person who fiddles to get a bit more money. or an old Lady who cannot afford to pay her pension and gets four weeks in jail.

  4. Millner
    May 24th 2009, 4:04 pm

    Disgraced MP’s should not be allowed to stay on in parliament like a bad smell – they must resign their seats, and leave parliament immediately – the only reason they want to stay on, is so they can pick up a large lump sum cheque…..These dodgy MP’s must get the boot NOW. They don’t deserve £64,000 in “resettlement grant” cash. Do they?

    The Jury Team http://juryteam.org are putting up candidates in ALL constituencies for the EU elections.

    Jury Team candidates stand for good governance. it has concrete policies, that are all to do with fixing the broken political system.

    1. Get as many independents elected as possible – force the government to justify its policies, and to present reasoned argument for them – not relying on the whip, which turns Parliament into an extension of the executive.

    2. Get Chairmen of the committees elected by secret ballot, so stop the whips controlling the appointments.

    3. Selection to committees by voting, not by appointment. No whipping to be allowed.

    4. No members of the government at all to be allowed to sit on committees in parliament.

    for more detail, see the main Jury Team website. http://juryteam.org

    To interact with the candidates and other supporters, visit our new social networking site

    http://juryteam.socialgo.com

    and http://juryteam.ning.com

    Promoted by Evan Philip Millner and other candidates on behalf of Jury Team at 152 Grosvenor Road, London, SW1V 3JL.

  5. laura
    Jun 4th 2009, 12:02 pm

    Surely there should be a law passed that allows the people to opt for a new election when MPs have made such huge mistakes, rather than relying on the politicians themselves. Lets have a recall law in the UK and make MPs accountable: –

    http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/recall/

  6. laura
    Jun 4th 2009, 12:12 pm

    I just hope that we have some guarantee that if this happens in the future we have protections in law ensuring MPs accountability – lets have a recall law in the UK that allows the people to call for a new vote when an MP has broken their trust.

    http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/recall/