<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A telephone poll tax?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/a-telephone-poll-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/a-telephone-poll-tax/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;Final Third&#8217; levy: public or private asset? &#171; Connected Research</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/a-telephone-poll-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8216;Final Third&#8217; levy: public or private asset? &#171; Connected Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2978#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>[...] egalitarian, and therefore attractive, argument to that, albeit that you could also argue, as Nigel Stanley at the TUC did on Wednesday, that it is a very regressive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] egalitarian, and therefore attractive, argument to that, albeit that you could also argue, as Nigel Stanley at the TUC did on Wednesday, that it is a very regressive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Marks</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/a-telephone-poll-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2978#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>And to think we were told privatisation would mean private investment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think we were told privatisation would mean private investment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;Final Third&#8217; Fund and difficulties in the US universal service fund: some thoughts &#171; Connected Research</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/06/a-telephone-poll-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8216;Final Third&#8217; Fund and difficulties in the US universal service fund: some thoughts &#171; Connected Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=2978#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>[...] Stanley posts today on Touchstone regarding whether the levy is the right way to meet the &#8216;extremely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stanley posts today on Touchstone regarding whether the levy is the right way to meet the &#8216;extremely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-05-24 12:03:36 -->
