<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More thoughts on equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/07/more-thoughts-on-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/07/more-thoughts-on-equality/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Marks</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/07/more-thoughts-on-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=3161#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>The reason why people might identify &quot;fairness&quot; more positively than &quot;equality&quot; is pretty obvious. The people who gain from our unfair society have spent a lot of time and effort knocking equality as a concept, but can&#039;t really attack &quot;fairness&quot; - it&#039;s not easy to propose that some unfairness might be beneficial, is it? Whereas it&#039;s been easier to associate equality with uniformity.

The ability that people and low- and middle-incomes had in the past to improve their lot through effective union organisation has been denied them by New Labour, and it&#039;s no accident. Ostensibly pro-poor measures such as tax credits benefit employers for whom handouts are better than union organisation, and can easily be reversed by a future Tory government without much in the way of a struggle.

My problem with Denham is that I doubt very much the Guardian could have got the impression they did without some help - in other words, someone at the Denham end was very keen to say &quot;the minister will be talking about equality, but don&#039;t worry he&#039;s bashing lefties, not calling for a more equal society.&quot; Far from paying a political price, this has probably helped Denham - the capitalist press seem delighted by his comments, however misrepresented.

By the way, am I alone in thinking that for the past twelve years the Labour party has been going through a period of &quot;electoral inexpediency&quot;? How else do you lose millions of votes and halve the membership? Never before has Labour in office been so out of touch with its members and voters - perhaps because we haven&#039;t really had a Labour government...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why people might identify &#8220;fairness&#8221; more positively than &#8220;equality&#8221; is pretty obvious. The people who gain from our unfair society have spent a lot of time and effort knocking equality as a concept, but can&#8217;t really attack &#8220;fairness&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s not easy to propose that some unfairness might be beneficial, is it? Whereas it&#8217;s been easier to associate equality with uniformity.</p>
<p>The ability that people and low- and middle-incomes had in the past to improve their lot through effective union organisation has been denied them by New Labour, and it&#8217;s no accident. Ostensibly pro-poor measures such as tax credits benefit employers for whom handouts are better than union organisation, and can easily be reversed by a future Tory government without much in the way of a struggle.</p>
<p>My problem with Denham is that I doubt very much the Guardian could have got the impression they did without some help &#8211; in other words, someone at the Denham end was very keen to say &#8220;the minister will be talking about equality, but don&#8217;t worry he&#8217;s bashing lefties, not calling for a more equal society.&#8221; Far from paying a political price, this has probably helped Denham &#8211; the capitalist press seem delighted by his comments, however misrepresented.</p>
<p>By the way, am I alone in thinking that for the past twelve years the Labour party has been going through a period of &#8220;electoral inexpediency&#8221;? How else do you lose millions of votes and halve the membership? Never before has Labour in office been so out of touch with its members and voters &#8211; perhaps because we haven&#8217;t really had a Labour government&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-05-24 14:26:05 -->
