<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/12/youth-unemployment-now-vs-the-80s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/12/youth-unemployment-now-vs-the-80s/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Murphy</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/12/youth-unemployment-now-vs-the-80s/comment-page-1/#comment-4790</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=5231#comment-4790</guid>
		<description>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#039;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  

Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#039; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  

And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated - nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs - tantamount to economic suicide.  

Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!

If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com.

Pete Murphy
Author, &quot;Five Short Blasts&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#8217;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  </p>
<p>Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#8217; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  </p>
<p>And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated &#8211; nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs &#8211; tantamount to economic suicide.  </p>
<p>Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!</p>
<p>If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at <a href="http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com</a>.</p>
<p>Pete Murphy<br />
Author, &#8220;Five Short Blasts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2009/12/youth-unemployment-now-vs-the-80s/comment-page-1/#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=5231#comment-4767</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, Wayne Strnad and Spud Roberts, Frank Cook. Frank Cook said: Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public ... http://bit.ly/7Rt4V0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, Wayne Strnad and Spud Roberts, Frank Cook. Frank Cook said: Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s | ToUChstone blog: A public &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7Rt4V0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7Rt4V0</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-02-11 20:54:12 -->
