<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxing financial transactions: why the underdog is still my favourite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-5470</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/#comment-5470</guid>
		<description>Let me address the question raised: automated payments transactions taxes are something the TUC is familiar with - we have looked at them

There are issues - and they&#039;re certainly not an alternative to CGT - which is an essential back stop for income tax

And nor are they a replacement for income tax - they could not really be made progressive

But - they are more progressive than any VAT because they include transactions that the wealthy tend to undertake which are exempt from that tax - which imposes heavily on the poorest

For that reason I personally support them as an alternative or supplement to VAT which can then be at a lower rate

I also support them for another reason - the Revenue then would know about every bank account - and that in itself has a massive potential benefit in also tackling tax evasion

So - it&#039;s an issue on which I hope we will progress - but it needs very careful consideration before a proposal can be made 

Richard Murphy
www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me address the question raised: automated payments transactions taxes are something the TUC is familiar with &#8211; we have looked at them</p>
<p>There are issues &#8211; and they&#8217;re certainly not an alternative to CGT &#8211; which is an essential back stop for income tax</p>
<p>And nor are they a replacement for income tax &#8211; they could not really be made progressive</p>
<p>But &#8211; they are more progressive than any VAT because they include transactions that the wealthy tend to undertake which are exempt from that tax &#8211; which imposes heavily on the poorest</p>
<p>For that reason I personally support them as an alternative or supplement to VAT which can then be at a lower rate</p>
<p>I also support them for another reason &#8211; the Revenue then would know about every bank account &#8211; and that in itself has a massive potential benefit in also tackling tax evasion</p>
<p>So &#8211; it&#8217;s an issue on which I hope we will progress &#8211; but it needs very careful consideration before a proposal can be made </p>
<p>Richard Murphy<br />
<a href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a van hook</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>a van hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/01/taxing-financial-transactions/#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of people out there saying &quot;a bank tax will just be passed on to consumers. You can&#039;t tax companies, they just pass it on to you and me.&quot; 
Well, of course they will pass on the transaction tax on my activities - at 0.015% I can handle that. I dont believe They will be jacking up my checking account fees, etc. unless competition for my banking suddenly drops and I dont have as many alternatives to choose from.

I like the idea of a financial transaction tax. I wonder if you could ultimately replace capital gains taxes with a transaction tax. Have you heard about the Autmated Payments Transaction tax?  http://www.apttax.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of people out there saying &#8220;a bank tax will just be passed on to consumers. You can&#8217;t tax companies, they just pass it on to you and me.&#8221;<br />
Well, of course they will pass on the transaction tax on my activities &#8211; at 0.015% I can handle that. I dont believe They will be jacking up my checking account fees, etc. unless competition for my banking suddenly drops and I dont have as many alternatives to choose from.</p>
<p>I like the idea of a financial transaction tax. I wonder if you could ultimately replace capital gains taxes with a transaction tax. Have you heard about the Autmated Payments Transaction tax?  <a href="http://www.apttax.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apttax.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-02-11 10:14:19 -->
