<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If the Japanese Government supports a Robin Hood Tax, it’s a lot more likely to happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/02/if-the-japanese-government-supports-a-robin-hood-tax-its-a-lot-more-likely-to-happen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/02/if-the-japanese-government-supports-a-robin-hood-tax-its-a-lot-more-likely-to-happen/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owen Tudor</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/02/if-the-japanese-government-supports-a-robin-hood-tax-its-a-lot-more-likely-to-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-5850</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Tudor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=6045#comment-5850</guid>
		<description>Giles (&lt;a href=&quot;http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2010/02/18/the-ft-considers-tobin-taxes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the freethinking economist&lt;/a&gt;) has demonstrated the dangers of blogging on the run. Or something. His blog about my blog says that my comments about Brazil&#039;s transactions tax are not relevant to the Robin Hood Tax. Er... I didn&#039;t mention Brazil, I was referring to the FT/Bloomberg reports on Japan (easy to confuse? I think not.)

But Brazil&#039;s tax, which as he says the FT approves of, does raise two points. First, such taxes can be introduced successfully on a country by country basis (whereas many commentators - I don&#039;t mean Giles - have said they can&#039;t). And secondly (and I realise I&#039;m being totally opportunistic here), it is certainly the case that Brazil&#039;s President Lula has supported the idea of broader transaction taxes in the past and, we believe, still does. He&#039;s not in the G7, of course, but he IS in the G20 and will therefore have a voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giles (<a href="http://freethinkingeconomist.com/2010/02/18/the-ft-considers-tobin-taxes/" rel="nofollow">the freethinking economist</a>) has demonstrated the dangers of blogging on the run. Or something. His blog about my blog says that my comments about Brazil&#8217;s transactions tax are not relevant to the Robin Hood Tax. Er&#8230; I didn&#8217;t mention Brazil, I was referring to the FT/Bloomberg reports on Japan (easy to confuse? I think not.)</p>
<p>But Brazil&#8217;s tax, which as he says the FT approves of, does raise two points. First, such taxes can be introduced successfully on a country by country basis (whereas many commentators &#8211; I don&#8217;t mean Giles &#8211; have said they can&#8217;t). And secondly (and I realise I&#8217;m being totally opportunistic here), it is certainly the case that Brazil&#8217;s President Lula has supported the idea of broader transaction taxes in the past and, we believe, still does. He&#8217;s not in the G7, of course, but he IS in the G20 and will therefore have a voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The FT considers Tobin Taxes &#171; Freethinking Economist</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/02/if-the-japanese-government-supports-a-robin-hood-tax-its-a-lot-more-likely-to-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>The FT considers Tobin Taxes &#171; Freethinking Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=6045#comment-5849</guid>
		<description>[...] would like to point out that &#8211; unlike what the crowing TUC and LibCon seem to think &#8211; this is NOT a Robin Hood tax.  Brazil&#8217;s 2% tax is about 40 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would like to point out that &#8211; unlike what the crowing TUC and LibCon seem to think &#8211; this is NOT a Robin Hood tax.  Brazil&#8217;s 2% tax is about 40 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Japan joins global call for Robin Hood tax</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/02/if-the-japanese-government-supports-a-robin-hood-tax-its-a-lot-more-likely-to-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Japan joins global call for Robin Hood tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=6045#comment-5843</guid>
		<description>[...] Tudor at the ToUChstone blog welcomed the news, adding:  Four out of seven. Er, that’s a majority isn’t it? Of course, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tudor at the ToUChstone blog welcomed the news, adding:  Four out of seven. Er, that’s a majority isn’t it? Of course, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-05-24 23:09:49 -->
