It seems George Osborne was a bit hasty to claim that: “we now have a consensus of economic opinion aligned with the Conservatives saying that dealing with the deficit is essential to create jobs and sustain the recovery”. His comment followed the widely publicised publication of a letter from twenty economists in The Sunday Times. The Financial Times has two letters today signed by over sixty economists attacking the Sunday Times letter. The letters urge politicians to put the restoration of growth before the cutting of the deficit. Whatever one’s view on the deficit, it is clearly wrong in the light of this to claim that there is anything like a consensus amongst economists backing the idea of early action on the deficit.
One Response to Two New Economists’ Letters: No consensus on cuts
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Market Analysts: The Chancellor isn’t responsible for low gilt yields
- EU: Single Market, Equal Rights?
- EU Treaty: Europe’s social protections are part of the solution, not the problem
- French unions put Sarko’s FTT in context
- Web links for 9th February 2012
- Now ITV sails into renewables?
- Social housing and under-occupation: the wrong priorities
- QE: welcome but more needs to be done
- Some good news on jobs, but what does it mean?
- Freeze the auto-enrolment thresholds to keep women in pensions
- The magnificent (European) nine backing Robin Hood
- Web links for 7th February 2012
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Campaign action: Tell Darling and Osborne not to risk the recovery | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC on Feb 19th 2010 at 1:04 pm:
[...] recovery Posted at 1:01 pm on 19 Feb 10 by John Wood In the FT today, over 60 senior economists have written to demand that Alistair Darling and George Osborne refrain from making premature cuts to public [...]