It seems George Osborne was a bit hasty to claim that: “we now have a consensus of economic opinion aligned with the Conservatives saying that dealing with the deficit is essential to create jobs and sustain the recovery”. His comment followed the widely publicised publication of a letter from twenty economists in The Sunday Times. The Financial Times has two letters today signed by over sixty economists attacking the Sunday Times letter. The letters urge politicians to put the restoration of growth before the cutting of the deficit. Whatever one’s view on the deficit, it is clearly wrong in the light of this to claim that there is anything like a consensus amongst economists backing the idea of early action on the deficit.
One Response to Two New Economists’ Letters: No consensus on cuts
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Labour Market Report #26
- German model isn’t heaven, Faisal, but it beats British inequality!
- The KfW? “We should copy it” – banker
- Two years on – time for the Government to think again
- Web links for 23rd May 2012
- The government’s unimpressive job creation record
- BoE Agents’ Report suggests unemployment due to rise
- Euro-Parliament’s clear message to EU leaders: for growth’s sake, let’s have a Robin Hood Tax!
- Pat McFadden is right: we need to be making things
- Pressure mounts on single parents to move off unemployment benefits, but where are the family-friendly jobs?
- Monetary and fiscal stimulus are not the same thing
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Campaign action: Tell Darling and Osborne not to risk the recovery | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC on Feb 19th 2010 at 1:04 pm:
[...] recovery Posted at 1:01 pm on 19 Feb 10 by John Wood In the FT today, over 60 senior economists have written to demand that Alistair Darling and George Osborne refrain from making premature cuts to public [...]