It seems George Osborne was a bit hasty to claim that: “we now have a consensus of economic opinion aligned with the Conservatives saying that dealing with the deficit is essential to create jobs and sustain the recovery”. His comment followed the widely publicised publication of a letter from twenty economists in The Sunday Times. The Financial Times has two letters today signed by over sixty economists attacking the Sunday Times letter. The letters urge politicians to put the restoration of growth before the cutting of the deficit. Whatever one’s view on the deficit, it is clearly wrong in the light of this to claim that there is anything like a consensus amongst economists backing the idea of early action on the deficit.
One Response to Two New Economists’ Letters: No consensus on cuts
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Robin Hood Tax global week of action: A big week for a tiny tax
- The Continuing Tale of Migrant Exploitation
- Do you know where your food comes from? The shocking reality of #forcedlabour in the UK food industry
- FT is right about 41,000 jobs from Regional Growth Fund
- Women, part-time work, and underemployment
- Record levels of under-employment show that the jobs crisis is far worse than the headline figures
- Web links for 13th May 2012
- Exit polls confirm tide against Merkel’s austerity
- European Court confirms cost not the only public procurement criterion
- Where does social Europe stand now?
- Web links for 11th May 2012
- Benefit Cuts will hit tenants, not landlords
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Campaign action: Tell Darling and Osborne not to risk the recovery | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC on Feb 19th 2010 at 1:04 pm:
[...] recovery Posted at 1:01 pm on 19 Feb 10 by John Wood In the FT today, over 60 senior economists have written to demand that Alistair Darling and George Osborne refrain from making premature cuts to public [...]