<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuts in the value of benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/</link>
	<description>Policy news and comment from the Trades Union Congress (TUC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A bad Budget for jobs and for jobseekers &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-13041</link>
		<dc:creator>A bad Budget for jobs and for jobseekers &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=8471#comment-13041</guid>
		<description>[...] value of benefits is also being cut which will make jobsearch harder (£65 is not much with which to survive and pay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] value of benefits is also being cut which will make jobsearch harder (£65 is not much with which to survive and pay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How does Reverse Mortgage Work? &#124; Real Estate Talk</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-12350</link>
		<dc:creator>How does Reverse Mortgage Work? &#124; Real Estate Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=8471#comment-12350</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuts in the value of benefits &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuts in the value of benefits | ToUChstone blog: A public policy &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Cuts in the value of benefits &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-10994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Cuts in the value of benefits &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=8471#comment-10994</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Cuts in the value of benefits http://bit.ly/cbHyME [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Cuts in the value of benefits <a href="http://bit.ly/cbHyME" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cbHyME</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Budget claims on child poverty do not stack up &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/06/cuts-in-the-value-of-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-10855</link>
		<dc:creator>Budget claims on child poverty do not stack up &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/?p=8471#comment-10855</guid>
		<description>[...] that the disregard was worth up to £17 a week for working families on low incomes). Reducing the value of Child Benefit, and replacing the income lost with CTC, may look as if it&#8217;s not a cut, but for families in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the disregard was worth up to £17 a week for working families on low incomes). Reducing the value of Child Benefit, and replacing the income lost with CTC, may look as if it&#8217;s not a cut, but for families in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: touchstoneblog.org.uk @ 2012-02-11 10:07:15 -->
