From the TUC

Benefit cuts won’t end problem drug use

20 Aug 2010, by in Society & Welfare

Today’s Home Office consultation on the Government’s new drug strategy asks:

Should we be making more of the potential to use the benefit system to offer claimants a choice between: some form of financial benefit sanction, if they do not take action to address their drug or alcohol dependency;  or, additional support to take such steps, by tailoring the requirements placed upon them as a condition of benefit receipt to assist their recovery?

It’s interesting to remember that within days of entering Government the Coalition decided not to proceed with Labour pilots that would, in part, have followed this appoach. At the time, the Social Security Advisory Committee’s (SSAC) critical report was cited as the reason – as has been widely reported today, the committee concluded that:

There is little, if any, evidence that strong mandation will support problem drug users to succeed in treatment and move towards the labour market. It may, in fact, move people further from the labour market as they drop out of the benefits system and turn to other sources of income such as crime and prostitution.

The SSAC report documents responses from organisations including the Scottish Government, who:

noted that research shows that any action that is seen to be coercive or inappropriately punitive will not work and that such an approach will deter people from either seeking drug treatment or claiming benefits.

And from Release, who:

noted that the use of rewards would be a far more positive approach than merely using penalties in order to achieve an objective [and] stated that whilst there is nothing inherently wrong in applying sanctions to achieve an aim, this should not be at the risk of driving away vulnerable individuals from the benefit system.

from Drugscope, who:

expressed concern that Jobcentre Plus staff without specialist knowledge of substance misuse and assessment will have to make these judgements [about whether or not a claimant is a problem drug user] based on limited observation.

The consultation responses were clear – as a means to engage problem drug users in treatment, evidence and experience shows sanctions won’t work and are instead likely to cause considerable harm.

2 Responses to Benefit cuts won’t end problem drug use

  1. Tweets that mention Benefit cuts won’t end problem drug use | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC — Topsy.com
    Aug 20th 2010, 11:33 am

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, KatieCurtis. KatieCurtis said: RT @touchstoneblog: Benefit cuts won’t end problem drug use http://bit.ly/bzgXAb […]

  2. WT
    Aug 20th 2010, 4:34 pm

    I am disappointed with today’s proposal to cut benefits of addicts. Another ‘tough stance’ it seems on a vulnerable group (following that on the disabled), and on the same day as it is announced that revenue and customs are going to go ‘softer’ on tax evasion.

    Annual cost to the country from benefit fraud £1.1 billion
    Annual cost to the country from tax evasion £95 billion

    http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2010/08/09/i-couldnt-have-said-it-better-myself/

    It wasn’t the disabled or people living a wretched life hooked on drugs who got this country into the mess that it’s in.

    I had hoped that the coalition would take a different approach to these problems than Labour did.