Well, not the individuals, but their armed guards. According to yesterday’s News of the World, the government has decided on a £50 million cut from the £150 million p.a. cost of providing police guards for the royal family that would remove protection from less well-known members. (This may be a bit of wishful thinking, other papers have been slow to follow up this story and, back in April, this was a move being demanded by the NOTW’s sister paper The Sun.)
One Response to Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Labour Market Report #26
- German model isn’t heaven, Faisal, but it beats British inequality!
- The KfW? “We should copy it” – banker
- Two years on – time for the Government to think again
- Web links for 23rd May 2012
- The government’s unimpressive job creation record
- BoE Agents’ Report suggests unemployment due to rise
- Euro-Parliament’s clear message to EU leaders: for growth’s sake, let’s have a Robin Hood Tax!
- Pat McFadden is right: we need to be making things
- Pressure mounts on single parents to move off unemployment benefits, but where are the family-friendly jobs?
- Monetary and fiscal stimulus are not the same thing
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Tweets that mention Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com on Aug 16th 2010 at 10:22 pm:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog and Helen Flanagan, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals http://bit.ly/ate54w [...]