Well, not the individuals, but their armed guards. According to yesterday’s News of the World, the government has decided on a £50 million cut from the £150 million p.a. cost of providing police guards for the royal family that would remove protection from less well-known members. (This may be a bit of wishful thinking, other papers have been slow to follow up this story and, back in April, this was a move being demanded by the NOTW’s sister paper The Sun.)
One Response to Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Market Analysts: The Chancellor isn’t responsible for low gilt yields
- EU: Single Market, Equal Rights?
- EU Treaty: Europe’s social protections are part of the solution, not the problem
- French unions put Sarko’s FTT in context
- Web links for 9th February 2012
- Now ITV sails into renewables?
- Social housing and under-occupation: the wrong priorities
- QE: welcome but more needs to be done
- Some good news on jobs, but what does it mean?
- Freeze the auto-enrolment thresholds to keep women in pensions
- The magnificent (European) nine backing Robin Hood
- Web links for 7th February 2012
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Tweets that mention Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com on Aug 16th 2010 at 10:22 pm:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog and Helen Flanagan, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals http://bit.ly/ate54w [...]