Well, not the individuals, but their armed guards. According to yesterday’s News of the World, the government has decided on a £50 million cut from the £150 million p.a. cost of providing police guards for the royal family that would remove protection from less well-known members. (This may be a bit of wishful thinking, other papers have been slow to follow up this story and, back in April, this was a move being demanded by the NOTW’s sister paper The Sun.)
One Response to Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
- Cost of Living: Time to write a letter to the poorest?
- Economic inequality and social justice – lessons from Northern Europe
- G8: Facing both ways means facing the wrong way
- It’s just business. Is that the extent of our foreign policy?
- Tackling the global jobs crisis: unions call for G20 action
- From Obama to Mazzucato to TUC: we need a growth agenda now!
- National Work from Home Day
- Cuts to homes energy efficiency drive up fuel poverty
- Employment Blackspots Update
- Robin Hood Tax global week of action: A big week for a tiny tax
- The Continuing Tale of Migrant Exploitation
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Tweets that mention Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC -- Topsy.com on Aug 16th 2010 at 10:22 pm:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog and Helen Flanagan, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Cuts Watch #208: Minor Royals http://bit.ly/ate54w [...]