During the summer, a swathe of Councils switched off their safety cameras, but now it looks as though some parts of the UK will hold out against this trend. North East Lincolnshire has decided not to cuts its funding for Safer Roads Humber and the Scottish government has said that the country’s 500 cameras will remain in place. In addition, some authorities are switching from fixed to mobile cameras and some communities are still winning campaigns to introduce new cameras – Holt and Hallow in Worcestershire being the latest. But these stand alone authorities may well be in a minority, as larger Councils like Norfolk are still voting to close them down.
One Response to Cuts Watch #264: Saving (some) safety cameras
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Labour Market Report #26
- German model isn’t heaven, Faisal, but it beats British inequality!
- The KfW? “We should copy it” – banker
- Two years on – time for the Government to think again
- Web links for 23rd May 2012
- The government’s unimpressive job creation record
- BoE Agents’ Report suggests unemployment due to rise
- Euro-Parliament’s clear message to EU leaders: for growth’s sake, let’s have a Robin Hood Tax!
- Pat McFadden is right: we need to be making things
- Pressure mounts on single parents to move off unemployment benefits, but where are the family-friendly jobs?
- Monetary and fiscal stimulus are not the same thing
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Cuts Watch #322: Cutting safety cameras could cost 800 deaths a year | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC on Nov 24th 2010 at 1:51 pm:
[...] authorities around the country have pulled the plug on funding for cameras, though some have had second thoughts recently. The RAC Foundation plans to send Prof Allsop’s report to every highway authority in the [...]