During the summer, a swathe of Councils switched off their safety cameras, but now it looks as though some parts of the UK will hold out against this trend. North East Lincolnshire has decided not to cuts its funding for Safer Roads Humber and the Scottish government has said that the country’s 500 cameras will remain in place. In addition, some authorities are switching from fixed to mobile cameras and some communities are still winning campaigns to introduce new cameras – Holt and Hallow in Worcestershire being the latest. But these stand alone authorities may well be in a minority, as larger Councils like Norfolk are still voting to close them down.
One Response to Cuts Watch #264: Saving (some) safety cameras
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Energy Bill needs a plan for growth
- Cost of Living: Time to write a letter to the poorest?
- Economic inequality and social justice – lessons from Northern Europe
- G8: Facing both ways means facing the wrong way
- It’s just business. Is that the extent of our foreign policy?
- Tackling the global jobs crisis: unions call for G20 action
- From Obama to Mazzucato to TUC: we need a growth agenda now!
- National Work from Home Day
- Cuts to homes energy efficiency drive up fuel poverty
- Employment Blackspots Update
- Robin Hood Tax global week of action: A big week for a tiny tax
- The Continuing Tale of Migrant Exploitation
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:

Trackback made by Cuts Watch #322: Cutting safety cameras could cost 800 deaths a year | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC on Nov 24th 2010 at 1:51 pm:
[...] authorities around the country have pulled the plug on funding for cameras, though some have had second thoughts recently. The RAC Foundation plans to send Prof Allsop’s report to every highway authority in the [...]