Two years ago George Osborne set out a ‘new economic model’ in the annual Mais Lecture. I’ve got a blog post up at Shifting Grounds explaining how it is unravelling, with heavy downward revisions to business investment.
One Response to Osborne’s New Model
-
Updates:
-
Latest posts:
- Why UKIP can’t get its facts straight on climate change
- Equal marriage: The other side of the debate
- Professor Robert Reich on the UK economy at the TUC next week
- Homeworking has been on the rise despite the economic crisis
- Dhaka deaths: what made companies sign up for change?
- The “rust plating” of UK equality law continues
- Labour’s international development scorecard – how are they doing?
- Inflation: Where is Britain in the Global Race?
- Pensions consensus at a crossroads
- 400 reasons per million to challenge UKIP’s energy policy
- On Lost Decades & Free Lunches
- What would a progressive international development policy sound like?
-
Topics:
Recent comments
Search:



Comment made by jonathan on Mar 25th 2012 at 7:50 pm:
I’ve been learning that it’s difficult in the US to get much of a discussion of the Tory plans. A large part of that is The Economist dominates here, particularly with its web presence. They barely conceal bias. For example, Bagehot wrote about cutting the amount that will go to pensioners making relatively little. I understand the logic of bringing two systems into synch, but the issue was approached so bloodlessly I was reminded of every awful British stereotype. The human dimension, meaning less money for people without much money as people with more money get more money, was described as “problematic”. Being American, I thought of Douglas Haig ordering more troops over the top to their deaths.