RSS feed Philip Pearson's Archive

Philip Pearson

Philip Pearson

Climate change, energy and transport are the main parts of my brief as a Senior Policy Officer in the TUC’s Economic & Social Affairs Department. Working out an effective trade union response to climate change has been a huge challenge, very much a collective effort both inside the TUC and with our affiliated unions. It’s been difficult to draw any proper boundaries to this work, as it seems to affect so many of our activities and union members out there – in the energy, transport, manufacturing and services, skills and training, education and workplace organising, rights at work … much of what we do, in fact. Green jobs. I even think about them on my allotment.

I’m a member of the European Trade Union Confederation’s sustainable development group, building common ground with our affiliates across Europe. And I am currently chair the ITUC’s working group on climate change, our interface with the Kyoto treaty processes, magnifying my carbon footprint in so doing.

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    Climate change? It’s so last century! Defra, the environment department, is planning to cut the number of civil servants working on how we adapt to climate change from over 30 officials to just six. Today, the government publishes a fire and rescue services review with a reported £200m budget cut. Meanwhile, out there in the real world, firefighters across the UK attended nearly twice as many flooding incidents in 2012 than in 2011. New figures obtained by the Fire Brigades Union under the Freedom of Information Act show UK fire and rescue services were called to 22,518 flooding incidents last year compared with 13,042 the year before. But it all makes perfect sense on Planet UKIP, where “climate change is so last century.”

    Continue Reading →

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    But Will (Straw, in the Times), if we’ll talk about fracking gas, will climate sceptics talk about climate science? UKIP is dragging climate denial along the coattails of its get-out-of-Europe campaign.  In a rational world, you can readily negotiate between equivalents: different forms of energy needed in our energy mix, for instance: the benefits of wind power vs fracking shale gas, as Will Straw rightly argues. But would climate sceptics really trade ideology for science? They’re not equivalents. Last Thursday, global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, as measured at Hawaii’s Mauna Loa volcano, reached 400 parts per million. Is that debatable with UKIP that says, “climate change is so last century”?

    Continue Reading →

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    That every crisis brings an opportunity applies in spades to the dire situation of UK Coal, our biggest coal producer. UK Coal has been in acute financial difficulty following the disastrous fire at Daw Mill. Collapse of UK Coal would wipe a reported £360m off the value of retirement savings for 6,800 pension scheme members. The government’s Pension Protection Fund would have to meet the estimated £540m bill. Renationalisation of Daw Mill may be a way forward – technically, this means returning Daw Mill to the Coal Authority, a DECC quango. The authority owns and licences, on behalf of the nation, the vast majority of the coal in Great Britain, as well as former coal mines. It’s a NDPB (non-departmental public body) sponsored by DECC.

    Continue Reading →

  • Environment

    Coal May Day

    1st May 2013 — Filed under: Environment

    Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    2,000 coal mining jobs are at risk as UK Coal, Britain’s largest coal producer, is reported to be seeking voluntary liquidation after the devastating fire that closed its Daw Mill colliery. The company was hit by the loss of £100m of equipment, £160m of coal and incurred £35m in costs. Yet the government position appears to focus on  “managing short term challenges.” Is this managed collapse? There’s no strategy for a UK domestic coal industry with carbon capture and storage technology. Its absence  reinforces insecurity felt first and foremost by the 6,000-strong workforce directly or indirectly employed in the coal industry, including transport and supply chains. Letting go of UK coal will also boost our dependence on energy imports. Does that make sense?

    Continue Reading →

  • Environment

    Bring industry back home

    24th April 2013 — Filed under: Environment

    Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    In the UK, we import more carbon than we produce, due to the energy embedded in imports of everything from food and smart phones to wind turbines. It has boosted the UK’s carbon footprint by 10% since 1993, as UK manufacturing ”hollowed out”. Government support for energy-intensive industries like steel and ceramics should underpin their UK operations and  competitiveness risks up to 2020, according to the Committee on Climate Change’s (CCC) study: Reducing the UK’s carbon footprint and managing competitiveness risks. Yet these two sides of the UK’s carbon footprint – imported and home produced carbon emissions -  point to a new climate-aware industrial policy, that both targets high carbon import substitutes, and builds a long term framework for our energy intensive industries so they stay, and grow, here.

    Continue Reading →

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    There is a rapidly approaching moment of truth for the world’s stock markets.

    Sock markets 2According to Unburnable Carbon, their $4trillion evaluation of the oil, coal and gas energy reserves of the world’s top 200 energy companies can never be safely realised.

    Continue Reading →

  • Environment

    Can we make green cars here?

    15th April 2013 — Filed under: Environment

    Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    Britain may be the fifth best exporter of cars in the world, but we’re 15th in Europe in the uptake of electric cars and hybrids like the Prius. The driveaway message from the new ippr report on Low Emission Vehicles is that if we don’t move with the times, the manufacturing advantage we have built up over the past couple of decades in car assembly is under threat. Two warnings: only a third of the value of components needed to support UK manufacture are purchased in the UK. And, as ippr points out, “car companies based in the UK are predominantly foreign-owned, [they] have choices about where to invest and could choose to move their production to other countries.”

    Continue Reading →

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    Should we set a vision for manufacturing to produce 20% of GDP by 2020?  There was huge controversy when it emerged that steel contracts for the new £1.6billion Forth Road Bridge went to China, Portugal and Spain – though Tata Steel’s Dalzell steelworks in Motherwell stepped in to make some of the steel when a Spanish firm dropped out. More to the point – are any of the UK’s 1,000 offshore wind turbines made in the UK? Each turbine is made of a thousand tonnes of steel, combining six different types of steel product.

    Continue Reading →

  • Environment

    Dash for gas?

    26th March 2013 — Filed under: Environment

    Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    Gas van 2

    Whilst the Chancellor (not pictured here) may foresee gas as our energy future, Britain is grappling with a gas supply crisis, with the extremely cold weather depleting gas reserves and spiking gas prices.

    Continue Reading →

  • Philip Pearson Philip Pearson

    If yesterday’s Budget contained some solid good news for energy industries and the energy sector, why did it seem so last century? High energy users like steel and ceramics gained important new support, reflecting the concerted and evidence-based arguments that industry and trade unions have presented to government over the past three years. Two carbon capture pilot projects – one each for coal and gas – made it to the next stage. The answer lies in the new shale gas subsidy - and the Chancellor’s irresistable green dig: “Creating a low carbon economy should be done in a way that creates jobs rather than costing them.”

    Continue Reading →