Pensions & Investment

  • Helen Nadin Helen Nadin

    The Bank of England’s decision to extend quantitative easing by £50 billion (taking the total value of the QE programme to £325 billion) is welcome, providing further stimulus to our stagnating economy. Particularly in the absence of any significant Government stimulus measures, using monetary policy to prevent a second credit crunch and keep long-term borrowing costs low, therefore boosting activity in the rest of the economy, is currently one of the most significant interventions available to support us back to growth.

    But QE is far from perfect as a means to support the recovery, with increasing evidence that bank lending remains depressed despite the additional balance sheet boost that QE is providing.  This has led many, including Monetary Policy Member Dr Adam Posen, to call for a new type of QE to be developed, which would involve the Bank of England providing direct support to small and medium sized businesses, rather than, as is currently the case, buying Government bonds directly from banks and large financial institutions. And, with no economists entirely sure what the effects of the intervention are, there is also increasing evidence that while QE has boosted confidence and growth it may in the process have pushed up inflation (by boosting demand for assets which would not otherwise have been so highly priced) which would affect those who are already the poorest the most.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    The coalition government’s review of pensions auto-enrolment made two major changes to how  pensions auto-enrolment will work from the worker point of view.

    • There will be a three month wating period after someone starts a job before their employer has to auto-enrol them into a pension.
    • Instead of being auto-enrolled as soon as someone’s pay exceeds the bottom of the earnings band on which contributions have to be paid (£5,564), a new auto-enrolment trigger was introduced. This was set at the level at which people start paying income tax (£7,745). In other words as soon as your pay exceeds £7,745 you are auto-enrolled in a pension, and you and your employer both have to pay contributions on your earnings in excess of £5,564.

    The government’s consultation on uprating these thresholds has just closed. Our big concern is that the government keeps the link for the auto-enrolment trigger to the personal income tax allowance as the coalition agreement, on Lib Dem urging, says that this should rise to £10,000 a year.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    I have a piece on Left Foot Forward on today’s IFS report on public sector pensions, predictably misrepresented by much of the media.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    Pensions Minister Steve Webb has just announced the new detailed timetable for pensions auto-enrolment. This provides the small print for the delay announced in the Autumn Statement following lobbying by the small business lobby and the Beecroft review.

    My strong impression is that this delay was forced on the DWP, and could even be seen as a victory over a strong push for the permanent exemption of small firms from pensions auto-enrolment. But it is still bad news.

    Continue Reading →

  • Helen Nadin Helen Nadin

    In October the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published the consultation ‘Response to Call for Advice on the review of Directive 2003/41/EC: second consultation’. The consultation covered EIOPA’s draft advice to the European Commission on the review of the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP – Directive 2003/41/EC). The Directive applies to occupational pension schemes, which unlike insurance-based pension schemes do so on a not-for-profit basis.

    EIOPA will give their final advice to the Commission in mid-February on the reform of the IORP Directive, with a view to publishing a draft Directive later in the year. While this may sound very technical, the outcome of the consultation could be pivotal – and extremely adverse –for UK defined benefit (DB) pension schemes and the wider European Union economy. It is an issue that significantly concerns the TUC.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    In my earlier post on public sector pensions I asserted that indexing by earnings produces better results than indexing by prices. In the comments Luke Snell queried whether this was still true. He asked whether “this assertion is valid given trends over the past 10-15 years?”.

    Good question I thought. So I’ve knocked up a very quick spreadsheet that worked out whether you would be better off with a pension (or anything else for that matter) uprated by earnings, RPI inflation or CPI inflation.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    Business organisations are arguing that the introduction of pensions auto-enrolment later this year is an argument for holding down the minimum wage. At first sight they might have a point.

    Pensions auto-enrolment for the first time will force employers to contribute to the pensions of their staff. This is absolutely right, but unlike some employer complaints it is undoubtedly a burden on business as pensions contributions have a price tag. No doubt for staff higher up the income scale employers will attempt to recoup some of the costs from their wages, but as you cannot cut the minimum wage this is harder for those who on the legal minimum (though there may be some pressure on hours).

    But closer examination of the figures suggests that the cost of auto-enrolment, particularly for the next few years, will be tiny for minimum wage workers.

    Continue Reading →

  • Janet Williamson Janet Williamson

    David Cameron has grabbed the headlines by announcing that his Government is going to take action on executive pay. However, despite denouncing ‘market failure’ in the setting of executive pay, the only clear policy commitments he made were to give shareholders a binding vote on executive pay and more transparency.

    Why does this matter? Because if more disclosure and more power for shareholders is all that we are going to get from this Government on executive pay, it simply won’t work.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    It may be a quiet news day today, but that does not explain Robert Peston’s curious report, first on the Today programme and now on his blog, on public sector pensions. This claims – based on the work of John Ralfe:

    The increase in the normal retirement age from 60 to 67 for public sector workers has not led to significant savings in the cost of public-sector pensions.

    The story is odd in a number of ways. We can wonder why the BBC’s Business Editor is reporting on a non-business story in which he has not been much  involved before – unlike say John Moylan, their industry correspondent who has covered the story in depth. It is also strange that the BBC is covering research that has not – as far as we can tell – been published. It is certainly not on Mr Ralfe’s website.

    Continue Reading →

  • Nigel Stanley Nigel Stanley

    Once upon a time, long, long ago the vast majority of workplace pensions were final-salary defined benefit schemes run by trustees. Everyone could agree that periods of short membership of such schemes were an administrative headache all round. The law therefore allowed schemes to give employees their contributions back if they left before two years service, and to give the employer theirs back too.

    Today workplace pension provision is very different. More people are paying into defined contribution workplace pensions than defined benefit pensions. Some defined contribution schemes are run as occupational schemes with trust based governance, but most are contract-based. These are provided by a commercial pensions company and cannot make short service refunds as this provision is only available to trust-based schemes.

    Continue Reading →