From the TUC

Moving people from Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance

18 Jun 2010, by in Society & Welfare

The Coalition has always said that one of their priorities would be testing the 2.5 million people who get Incapacity Benefit, and moving them over to the new benefit, Employment and Support Allowance. One of the attractions has undoubtedly been the fact that this means subjecting these claimants to the new eligibility test, the Work Capability Assessment. Expert advice and disability organisations have been worried that this test is finding large numbers of people fit for work – including many with severe barriers.

At the beginning of the month, the government announced their plans to complete the reassessment by 2014. Given the reports about mistakes being made in assessing people now, some of us have been worried about the likely consequences of speeding up this process.

And it seems we weren’t alone. The First Report in the current Parliamentary session of the Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee draws to MPs’ ‘special attention’ the Employment and Support Allowance (Transitional Provisions, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit) (Existing Awards) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/ 875).

Now, this is one of those pieces of legislation with an obscure and boring name that actually have important effects. The Committee notes that the government expects that 23 per cent of IB claimants will be found fit for work, of whom half will be moved on to Jobseeker’s Allowance. That translates into more than quarter of a million people facing a benefit cut.

The Merits Committee gets the point about what is worrying about these plans:

“The Committee has seen a succession of regulations aimed at the reform of benefits and while welcoming the overarching policy intention of simplifying the system, the Committee has previously questioned some of the practicalities of its implementation – in particular whether Jobcentre staff have the capacity to absorb the pace of change and whether the DWP’s original plans had been sufficiently adapted to take the sudden rise in general unemployment generated by the recession into account.”

As the Committee points out, the government’s plans mean that 10,000 people a week will have to be re-assessed and processed. Within Jobcentre Plus, many people are worried about whether the Benefit Delivery Centres will be able to cope with this extra workload at a time when the recession has already cranked up the pressure. Will the agency be able to meet its Disability Discrimination Act obligations to adjust its JSA claim arrangements to take account of the access needs many will have?

The Merits Committee quotes a particularly damning passage from the very negative report on the draft regulations by the government’s social security advisers, the Social Security Advisory Committee:

“It is of particular concern to the Committee that the Department is moving ahead with the migration of existing claimants of incapacity benefits without a solid evidence base for either the decision to migrate or the proposed migration arrangements. The Committee notes that the evaluation of ESA for new claimant is not planned to be complete until 2011 by which time the proposed migration arrangements will have commenced.”

2 Responses to Moving people from Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance

  1. Tweets that mention Moving people from Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC —
    Jun 18th 2010, 11:37 am

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, TIGMOO. TIGMOO said: ToUChstone blog: Moving people from Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance […]

  2. Dave Neenhan
    Jun 19th 2010, 6:34 pm

    Incapacity Claimants with mental health issues are really going to be compromised as for all the claims about getting people with mental health problems off benefits and into work ( SCMH, Mind and the Mental Health Foundation were promising to get millions of benefits back in 2008 ) mental health charities working in the employment field are now telling the DWP that they are experiencing serious problems placing people with mental issues in lasting employment and , because they arent even covering their costs, would prefer to focus on contracts to work with ‘less challenging’ clients that they can help but wish the DWP to keep this information under wraps because it could be percieved as ‘ Disability Discrmination ‘.

    The DWP helpfully suggested that non-employment outcomes such as voluntary work could be a way forward for the hard to place mental health group but with a new Government now pressured to reduce the Incapacity benefits bill asap one wonders what is going to happen to this group of claimants as its a fair bet , particularly if quotas drive the reviews, that whatever makes these claimants so difficult to help also makes them very easy to target.

    Also , with unemployment rising, isn’t this a really good time to experiment with a more flexible benefit system that allows ‘people to work ‘irregularly’ , as and when they can , instead of in an all or nothing way? The Poverty Trap doesn’t simply operate through benefit rates, people are also trapped and public money is wasted by the mindless inflexibility of the benefits system .