From the TUC

Spending Review “regressive” – IFS

21 Oct 2010, by in Society & Welfare

The independent Institute for Fiscal Studies held their briefing on the Spending Review yesterday. The opening remarks from IFS Acting Director Carl Emmerson make interesting reading.

In one paragraph he explodes the Chancellor’s claim that his plans cut Departmental spending by less than the last government was planning. Mr Osborne has already announced £6 billion of his cuts, so of course his cuts are lower. The essential truth is that

by 2014–15 departmental spending is forecast to be below the level implied by the plans set out in Labour’s last Budget. And because this is true, any like-for-like comparison of spending in “unprotected areas” would also be higher in 2014–15 under the last Government’s plans than under the new Government’s plans.

I was also interested in his remarks on whether the Spending Review’s welfare changes were regressive. His answer is that the measures introduced by this government are regressive, but if you include the measures introduced in Alastair Darling’s last budget that the coalition has chosen not to reverse, then the top 2 percent do lose out more than everyone else – but even then the impact over the rest of the country is regressive:

Our analysis – published in August – shows that by including a wider set of benefit reforms announced by this government leads to the conclusion that the impact of all tax and benefit measures yet to come in reduces the incomes of lower income households by more than that of higher income households, with the notable exception of the richest 2% of the population who are the hardest hit. Therefore the tax and benefit changes are regressive rather than progressive across most of the income distribution. And when we add in the new measures announced yesterday this finding is, unsurprisingly, reinforced. So our analysis continues to show that, with the notable exception of the richest 2%, the tax and benefit components of the fiscal consolidation are, overall, being implemented in a regressive way.

3 Responses to Spending Review “regressive” – IFS

  1. Stephen Boyd
    Oct 21st 2010, 9:55 pm

    Richard, great work from you and the rest of the Touchstone team over the last couple of days. The blog is an indispensable resource for the movement. But I think it was left to Brad Delong to sum up on the CSR:

  2. Tweets that mention Spending Review “regressive” – IFS | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC —
    Oct 22nd 2010, 7:44 am

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ToUChstone blog, UNISON East Midlands. UNISON East Midlands said: Spending Review “regressive” – IFS […]

  3. Richard Exell

    Richard Exell
    Oct 22nd 2010, 10:32 am

    Thanks for the plaudit Stephen. I agree about Brad De Long’s piece – I’ve just Delicious’d it from this website. You might also like to see Paul Krugman’s article, which I’ve also Delicious’d.